Will the degradation of the respect given to the union between a man and a woman soon give way to man and two women…man and horse…woman and cat??? Is this a slippery slope?

The secular-progressive movement in this country appears to resists making any judgments against others behavior.

I don’t know why Bob and Bob do what they do and I really don’t care as long as it doesn’t affect me or my family. Their sexual behavior is an aberration of natural law. The question is whether they deserve privileges because of this aberration.

Someone who wants to preclude another person from enjoying the same governmental/social benefit based on some aspect of their race/religion/sex/sexual orientation is essentially a bigot. It doesn’t matter of you have some ideal or religious view or anything.

An good tool to use to determining if your statement falls under bigotry would be to substitue another race/gender etc and see if it sounds bigoted.

Per example, on the issue of marriage, instead of saying marriage should only be between a man and a woman, say marriage should only occur between whites or those of the same race. Sounds bigoted doesn’t it. Well that’s because it is.

Another good example would be Mayor Nagin’s statement on the rebuilding of New Orleans saying he wanted to keep New Orleans a majority African-American city. Change that to We want to keep X city a white-majority city. Sounds bigoted doesn’t it. That’s because it is.

Bigotry is bigotry regardless of the underlying reasons behind it. Don’t let people sugar-coat it or say it is for a good reason.